Subscribe to the ThisNation.com Online Texbook Today!
IMPORTANT SUBSCRIBER NOTICE: If you subscribed through
the Amazon Honor System, you will need request a new username and password.
We have upgraded our subscription system and we are unable to maintain
the old username and password you received through Amazon. We apologize
for the inconvenience. Please use this
form to request your new username and password. This change
will be effective September 30, 2005.
If your subscription has expired, you can renew
it online today.
Sample Chapter from the ThisNation.com Online Textbook
Voting & Elections: Electoral College
The
Framers of the Constitution were fearful of direct democracy and
the "tyranny of the majority" it might produce. Consequently, they
created a complex "filtering" process known as the Electoral College
which was intended to insulate the selection of the President from
the whims of the people. The Electoral College is comprised of "electors," individuals
who cast the electoral votes for their states. Originally, electors
were free to cast their votes as they chose. Today, electors are "bound" or "committed" by
state law to vote for the candidate who received the most popular
votes in their state. With the exceptions of Maine and Nebraska,
states give all of their electoral votes to the candidate who wins
a majority of votes in the state. (The procedure for electing the
President is outlined in Article
II, Section 1 of the Constitution.)
Each
state has a number of electoral votes equal to the number of Senators
and House Members it is eligible to send to the Congress. For example,
the state of New York elects two Senators (as every other state does)
and thirty-one Members of the House. New York, then, has thirty-three
electoral votes. The total number of electoral votes in the Electoral
College is 538--one for each of the one hundred Senators and 435
House Members plus the three allotted to the District of Columbia
by the 23rd Amendment to
the Constitution.
Electors
are chosen by the political parties in each state. When voters cast
their ballots in favor of a presidential candidate they are actually
voting for the electors of the same party as that candidate. When
a candidate wins the popular vote in a state, he or she wins that
state's electoral votes. Those votes are formally cast by the electors
chosen to represent the winning candidate's party in each state.
Some Peculiar Elections
Under
the original rules of the Electoral College, as established by the
Constitution, electors cast separate votes for President and Vice-president.
Whoever received a majority of electoral votes would be the President
and the runner-up would become the Vice-President. However, a problem
arose in the election of 1800 when Thomas Jefferson and his running
mate Aaron Burr each received 73 electoral votes. When no candidate
receives a clear majority of electoral votes, the Constitution specifies
that the House of Representatives shall choose the President. It
took the House thirty-six ballots to finally select Thomas Jefferson
as the third President of the United States. To avoid a repeat of
such problems, the 12th Amendment to
the Constitution provided for presidential and vice-presidential
candidates to run as a team, not individually.
In
2000, the outcome of the presidential election was in doubt for several
weeks because of disputed ballots in the state of Florida. The state's
twenty-five electoral votes, ultimately awarded to George W. Bush,
proved to be decisive. By winning the state of Florida, Bush secured
enough electoral votes to win the presidential election, even though his opponent,
Al Gore, won more popular votes nationwide. If the state of Florida had
not been able to certify its electoral votes for either candidate, the
winner of the election may have been determined in the United States House
of Representatives. It is unclear exactly what role the House would have
played under such a scenario, but the entire saga put the role of the Electoral
College on center stage. Since the election, several calls have been issued
to significantly reform or do away with the Electoral College.
While
debate over the Electoral College has intensified in the aftermath
of the disputed 2000 election, the emergence of Ross Perot as a legitimate
presidential candidate in 1992 also focused attention on this peculiar
mechanism for choosing presidents. Perot's candidacy raised the possibility
that the House might be called on to decide the election. If Perot
had managed to win enough electoral votes to deny either Bush or
Clinton a majority in the Electoral College, that is exactly what
would have happened. Perot, however, did not win a single electoral
vote in 1992 (or in 1996 when he ran a second time) and the House's
services were not required. In fact, there has only been one presidential
election decided by the House since the ratification of the 12th
Amendment--the election of 1824.
The
presidential election of 1824 is notable not only because the outcome
was decided by the House of Representatives but also because the
candidate who won the popular vote--Andrew Jackson--had failed to
win a majority of electoral votes. The House ultimately selected
his opponent, John Quincy Adams, to be the President. The results
enraged Jackson's supporters and he was elected President by a wide
margin four years later. In two other instances, once in 1876 and
again in 1888, the candidate who lost the popular vote won a majority
of electoral votes and was elected President. (See "QUICK
FACTS" about the Executive for a table of presidential candidates
and their popular and electoral vote totals.)
Presidential Campaigns & the Electoral College
Given the distribution of electoral votes across the nation, it is possible
for a presidential candidate to be elected President by winning less than
one-fourth of the states. Out of 538 electoral votes, a candidate must
win 270 to have a majority and the largest eleven states control 270 electoral
votes. (The eleven states include the bottom ten listed in the far right-hand
column of the table below and either Virginia or Georgia.) When candidates
campaign for the Presidency then, they tend to spend most of their time
in large states with large blocks of electoral votes--smaller states tend
to get overlooked.
Electoral Votes by State 2001 - 2010
State |
Votes |
State |
Votes |
State |
Votes |
State |
Votes |
| Alaska |
3 |
Nebraska |
5 |
South Carolina |
8 |
Virginia |
13 |
| Delaware |
3 |
Nevada |
5 |
Alabama |
9 |
Georgia |
15 |
| Montana |
3 |
New Mexico |
5 |
Colorado |
9 |
North Carolina |
15 |
| North Dakota |
3 |
Utah |
5 |
Louisiana |
9 |
New Jersey |
15 |
| South Dakota |
3 |
West Virginia |
5 |
Arizona |
10 |
Michigan |
17 |
| Vermont |
3 |
Arkansas |
6 |
Maryland |
10 |
Ohio |
20 |
| Washington, D.C. |
3 |
Kansas |
6 |
Minnesota |
10 |
Illinois |
21 |
| Wyoming |
3 |
Mississippi |
6 |
Wisconsin |
10 |
Pennsylvania |
21 |
| Hawaii |
4 |
Connecticut |
7 |
Missouri |
11 |
Florida |
27 |
| Idaho |
4 |
Iowa |
7 |
Tennessee |
11 |
New York |
31 |
| Maine |
4 |
Oklahoma |
7 |
Washington |
11 |
Texas |
34 |
| New Hampshire |
4 |
Oregon |
7 |
Indiana |
11 |
California |
55 |
| Rhode Island |
4 |
Kentucky |
8 |
Massachusetts |
12 |
|
|